SOPA/PIPA

As some of you may have noticed a number of websites across the internet have “gone dark” today. Wikipedia, BoingBoing, and Reddit for example and Google has blacked out their logo.

This has been done in protest of two bills currently in consideration by congress. H.R. 3261 “Stop Online Privacy Act” or SOPA and S.968 “Protect IP” or PIPA which could drastically alter the landscape of the internet as we have come to know it.

The EFF has a good summary of what these bills will do.

Big media and its allies in Congress are billing the Internet blacklist legislation as a new way to battle online infringement. But innovation and free speech advocates know that this initiative will do little to stop infringement online. What it will do is compromise Internet security, inhibit online expression, and slow growth in the technology sector.

As drafted, the legislation would grant the government and private parties unprecedented power to interfere with the Internet’s underlying infrastructure. The government would be able to force ISPs and search engines to block users’ attempts to reach certain websites’ URLs.

Let me jump in here. This would be done using DNS filtering the same technology that repressive regimes like China and Iran use to prevent their citizens from freely surfing the internet. In fact supporters of the bill provided a list of countries where this DNS filtering technology already works which includes, China, Iran, Bahrain, Myanmar, Syria, and others.

I would like the think that we in the US hold ourselves to a higher standard then these countries when it comes to censorship.

In response, third parties will woo average users to alternative servers that offer access to the entire Internet (not just the newly censored U.S. version), which will create new computer security vulnerabilities as the Internet grows increasingly balkanized.

It gets worse: the blacklist bills’ provisions would give corporations and other private parties new powers to censor foreign websites with court orders that would cut off payment processors and advertisers. Broad immunity provisions (combined with a threat of litigation) would encourage service providers to overblock innocent users or even block websites voluntarily. This gives content companies every incentive to create unofficial blacklists of websites, which service providers would be under pressure to block without regard to the First Amendment.

Service providers would be forced to monitor and police their users’ activities as well, threatening the DMCA safe harbors that have been vital to online innovation over the last decade. SOPA gives the government new powers to go after sites that provide information about tools that might be used to bypass the blacklists — even though these are often the same tools used by democratic activists around the world to bypass Internet censorship mechanisms implemented by authoritarian governments like Iran and China.

If you believe that this is extreme consider the lawsuit that Viacom is trying to revive against YouTube/Google. Under the current law, the DMCA, there is a safe harbor provision which shields a website from liability of copyright infringement of users activity if they are not aware of it and they remove the offending content once notified by the copyright holder.

This means if I upload a video to YouTube that contains copyright material the copyright holder has the right to notify YouTube who must then remove the video. If they comply with the takedown notice YouTube would not be liable for copyright damages. A judge granted summary judgement to YouTube as they had complied with all takedown requests in a timely manner. Viacom believes that YouTube needs to do more and wants it to screen all content for copyright infringement before it is allowed to be posted.

Under SOPA/PIPA YouTube and all other user content driven sites, would now be liable for copyright infringement of it’s users and any user that links to that content would also be liable for copyright infringement.

Have you ever posted a link to a YouTube video on your blog, Facebook, Twitter that you didn’t know specifically who owned the copyright and if the content was posted legally?

Take time to educate yourself on these bills and let your representatives know how you feel.

Resources:

 

Why do Superheros Wear Their Underwear on the Outside?

Tonight when I came home for work Alex asked me “Hey Dad, why do Superheros wear their underwear on the outside?” And you know what, I had absolutely no idea what to say.

“Well, it’s because, um, well you see, um…..I don’t know.”

I turned to the great Google tonight and apparently I’m not the only one out there asking the question as it’s the top suggestion.

Google Search Suggestions for Superheros wearing their underwear outside

Unfortunately, none of the links lead anywhere worthwhile.

I mean, think about this, your a superhero designing your costume. You have super strength, x-ray vision, unbreakable bones or what have you and the best you can come up with for your superhero costume is tights, underwear on the outside, and maybe a cape thrown in there for good measure. What purpose do the underwear serve? What fashion statement are they trying to make?

I don’t have any nifty theories of my own but quite possibly Mel Brooks summed it up the best,

We may look like pansies, but don’t get us wrong or else we’ll put out your lights.
We’re men, we’re men in tights (TIGHT tights),
Always on guard defending the people’s rights.
When you’re in a fix just call for the men in tights!

Royal Wedding

Today’s the Royal Wedding. I wouldn’t call myself a “Royal Watcher” but growing up in a Commonwealth country I guess it’s always just been something that’s sort of been there in the background.Diana and Charles. - Waving from the carriage.

The reason I bring this up is because I can distinctly recall what I was doing July 29th 1981, the wedding date of Charles and Diana. I was eight years old and was at Omi and Opa’s house in Mississauga. That morning my Dad and I were headed out of town for a canoe trip to Lady Evelyn Lake in Northern Ontario. It was about a six hour drive so to make sure that we got there with enough time to unload the car and canoe into the lake to find campsite we had to leave early in the morning.

I remember that after my Mom woke me up at some ungodly hour in the morning I walked down the hall to find everyone sitting in front of the old Zenith console TV watching the Royal Wedding live. I didn’t get to stay and see the whole thing but I do remember that it was right around the time she was getting to the church that we left.

Does anyone else remember that day?

First, Second, Third….

I’ve always been fascinated by churches with the names like ‘First United Methodist Church”, “Second United Methodist Church”, and so on. What makes the first different from the second? What about the “Last United Methodist Church”? Are they the end all be all of United Methodist Churches?

So in the spirit of xkcd I turned to Google to compare the number of search results returned for each church name. And so I present to you my completely unscientific results.

The Baptists have the largest web presence followed up by the United Methodist Church. Overall the Anglican’s and the United Church are the least represented.

And here’s to you the “Twelfth Baptist Church” in Boston, because after all, the first eleven just couldn’t get it right 🙂

Time to Update Adobe Reader

I promise some lighter fair here in the next couple of days but Adobe just published an update to a couple of versions of Adobe Reader that are labeled critical so you really need to update.

Start up Adobe Reader and in the Help menu select “Check for Updates”.

Adobe Reader - Check for Update

If there are updates available for your version they will be applied.

I would even suggest that if your not running version 10.0.1 (which I’m not in the picture above but I’m in the process of upgrading) that you go and update to this version. You can get it from Adobe at http://get.adobe.com/reader/

Time to Upgrade Your Flash Player

I’m a couple of days late posting this but if you haven’t done so already make sure that you update your Adobe Flash player. There are currently exploits out on in the internet lands that take advantage of certain security flaws in flash that could compromise your system. If there is anything that security experts can agree on is that if you need to run flash you need to keep it updated.

Validate Your Version

Go to the Adobe Web site and validate the version of flash that you are currently running: http://www.adobe.com/software/flash/about/ The version you are running will be displayed in the box “Version Information” which should look the the one below.

Your browser and operating system will dictate the correct version you need to be running but for the majority of users you are going to need version 10.2.159.1.

Update If Necessary

If you need to update you can go to http://get.adobe.com/flashplayer/ and you should be prompted to download the correct version for your browser and OS.

You can also use the Manual downloader if you don’t like the whole Adobe download system by following the download instructions at http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/191/tn_19166.html#main_ManualInstaller

Validate Your Version

After you update double check that you are now running the correct version by going back to http://www.adobe.com/software/flash/about/

Multiple Browsers

If you run multiple browsers like Internet Explorer, Firefox, Opera, Safari, etc, on the same computer you may need to update each browser separately. Double check that each browser is running the latest version.